Plans for a controversial combined heat and power plant in Milford have been deferred tonight (Monday).
Armagh I revealed last month that Planning Service officials would bring an opinion forward to approve an anaerobic digestion plant in the Co Armagh village.
But when the application came before tonight’s meeting of Armagh City and District Council’s public services scrutiny committee, it was put back.
Councillors of all parties voted unanimously to defer the application.
The application, which was lodged two years ago, led to residents meeting Armagh Council to put forward their arguments against the proposals.
But Amber Green Energy said at the time that the development would inject new life into the community of Milford, which has a long and proud industrial past, and create new much-needed jobs for the area.
The application is for a major 500kw anaerobic digester plant and a combined heat and power plant. It includes ancillary site works, with access from Hill Street.
It would be sited 155 metres south west of No 61 Hill Street, Milford, on land which is owned by farmer and local businessman Gerald Mackle.
An anaerobic digester uses organic matter, such as farm crops and animal waste, and converts it for power production and to generate heat.
The application is lodged in the name of Amber Green Energy, which has bases in Belfast and Milford, on the outskirts of Armagh.
A planning support statement revealed at the time that the site in question consists of 1.48 hectares. Part of it has been previously developed and it is adjacent to agricultural outbuildings.
The statement argued that the proposed changes to traffic into the area would have “minimal impact on local roads”, with six generated trips a day described as “negligible”.
It says that its distance from “sensitive receptors” ensured that public safety, human health and residential amenity will not be prejudiced.
Careful design, it was stated, with sealed tanks/impermeable ground/reception tanks, ensured there would be no impact on local natural resources, such as air quality or water quality.
The digester, it was pointed out at the outset, would be “screened from view” by virtue of the existing topography, existing agricultural buildings and mature trees.
The site was selected because of its “unique and discreet location” and the plant itself would be part submerged and hidden from public view.
The planning support statement compiled then said the proposal would provide electricity to the farm and it was in close proximity to the grid connection.
It was estimated that the plant would use some 28 tonnes of feedstock a day – 10,400 per annum – made up of 8000 tonnes of grass silage, 2000 tonnes of potato/fodder beet and 400 tonnes of slurry/manure.
The application has now been put back for further consideration.
Picture: Google Street View
Most read today
Operator’s Licence Notice
